Passion = Truth? How Jeffrey James Francis Ircink Sees The World? I love when people are passionate about something. That surging of emotion is the one honest measure of what truth is. It's a truthful display of how a person really feels about something or someone at that particular moment. That passion IS truth.



About me...

My photo
Greendale, Wisconsin, United States
Ex-producer of THE REALLY FUNNY HORNY GOAT INTERNATIONAL SHORT FILM FESTIVAL, playwright, actor, singer, outdoorsman, blogger, amateur photog, observer & bitcher, Beach Boys groupie, Brett Favre fanatic, lover of everything Celtic and forever a member in the Tribe of HAIR. Spent most of my life in the Village of Waterford, a small town just outside of the Milwaukee suburbs. After 12 years in North Hollywood, Bel Air and Culver City, Cali, I moved back to Wisconsin in September 2009. No regrets - of moving to LA OR moving back to WI. Have traveled to Belfast, Ireland, Dayton (OH), Manhattan, Seattle, Cedar Rapids, New York, Miami and Sydney, Australia with my plays. Moved back into the Village of Greendale where I was born. Life is good.

Celtic!

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Is Architecture Art? Neutra's Kaufmann House is up for auction.

"The Kaufmann house, Palm Springs, 1946, moved in the direction of the pavilion, which is Neutra's last development in domestic architecture. Horizontal planes resting on horizontal planes hover over transparent walls. The material loses its importance—magnificent as the dry-joint stone walls are in themselves—and the gist of the house is the weightless space enclosed. The victory over the front door is almost complete; it is reached by slow stages, like the Mexican house whose entrance on the street leads through a garden to an unemphasized door."
— Esther McCoy on Richard Neutra


NPR featured a story today about the upcoming auction of Richard Neutra's Kaufmann house in Palm Springs. The California homeowners who undertook the restoration hope Neutra’s masterpiece will play a role in a third movement: promoting architecture as a collectible art worthy of the same consideration as painting and sculpture.

This May, Christie’s will be handling the auction, with a presale estimate of $15 million to $25 million. Neutra's Kaufmann House will be part of Christie’s high-profile evening sale of postwar and contemporary art.

Commissioned by Edgar J. Kaufmann Sr., the Pittsburgh department store magnate who had commissioned Frank Lloyd Wright about a decade earlier to build Fallingwater in Pennsylvania, the house was designed as a desert retreat from harsh winters.

The Kaufmann House is one of the best-known designs by Neutra, a Viennese-born architect who moved to the United States in the 1920s and designed homes for the next few decades for many wealthy West Coast clients. His buildings are seen virtually as the apotheosis of Modernism’s International Style, with their skeletal steel frames and open plans. Yet Neutra was also known for catering sensitively to the needs of his clients, so that their houses would be not only functional but would also nurture their owners psychologically.

When Harrises first saw the Kaufmann House, it was neither a pretty palace nor an obvious candidate for restoration. Strikingly photographed in 1947 by Julius Shulman (see the black and white photo - the most well-known photo of Neutra's work), it stood vacant for several years after Kaufmann’s death in 1955.

Then it went through a series of owners, including the singer Barry Manilow, and a series of renovations. After purchasing the house around 1992 and its more than an acre of land for about $1.5 million, the Harrises removed the extra appendages and enlisted two young Los Angeles-area architects to restore the Neutra design, even seeking out the original providers of paint and fixtures.

Back to the NPR story and the premise: is architecture art? Christopher Knight, Los Angeles Times art critic smirked at the thought. "The idea that a house is a work of art strikes me as rather silly," said Knight. "Just because something is labeled 'art', does not mean it's good." Knight went out to say that the relevant question for a building is not 'is it art?', but 'is it good architecture?'

Then again, he has a right to his opinion. And the right to be a snob. A home is looked at and admired and talked about. It is created and put on display. It's worth can increase and people purchase them as investments. Just like you would a painting or a sculpture. Let me put this to you, Mr. Knight: if Piss Christ, a controversial 1989 photograph by American photographer Andre Serrano in which he depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a glass of his own urine is considered "art", then certainly some arguments must be made for some architecture - whether it's Neutra's Kaufmann House or Wright's Fallingwater, let say, to be considered "art" as well.

4 comments:

tony said...

let's buy this house and sit by the pool all day and blog. please.

brian said...

You guys got $15m between the two of you? wow. Go for it. If invited, I'd gladly spring for the margaritas (maybe it's Friday, but that gig just says "pitcher of margaritas" to me).

As for art vs. architecture. As a student of Wright, isn't good architecture an intersection of form and function? Perhaps great architecture integrates the environment, as the definition of function expands. Wright's Fallingwater, or even Taliesen, weaving through a creek, or a hill, has always seemed an example of doing this well, eh? Based on just the few, but stunning, pix, of the Neutra/Kaufmann House, it's hard not to see the open flow and form integrating well into the lives of it's inhabitants, pool bloggers or otherwise.

What is Art? To me, it's a "tangible" that causes emotion. It inspires, angers, causes joy, or perhaps just profound thought. Then, too, Art seems to be a degree of accessibility and sharing - else how do you emote to it? "Okay" Art in a public place has far more impact on people's emotions than a great work of art in some jerk's private collection. Bridging this for a private residence seems to be the biggest challenge. To be "art" - it needs to be shared, or out there, right? The worst offense, by definition, is not causing emotion, one way or the other. Hence, the crucifix in urine makes you mad, while Barry Manilow's old house makes me want to drink margaritas. I think they both classify as art, although I'd much rather visit the latter.

I think your snob pal got it all wrong, as these are two separate questions. Great architecture is not necessarily art. Poor architecture shouldn't disqualify as art either, should it? By that definition, every work of Wright's (I've walked through dozens) seems, to me, to be art. Are they all "great" architecturally, where the form/function/environment intersect as one? Probably not.

But that pool, and those digs definitely, seem to score big on both questions.

Good topic. Thanks for letting me add to the blog pool.

Best of luck house hunting!

Jeffrey James Ircink said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jeffrey James Ircink said...

brian, didn't know you were a fan of Wright's. i'm researching two possible plays on him. we should talk. do i have your email??

 
Related Posts with Thumbnails